An adaptable architecture.
QONITIF can be presented through several scenarios: secure SaaS interface, dedicated instance, sovereign cloud, client environment or hybrid architecture depending on field constraints.
QONITIF is designed to adapt to sensitive environments. Sovereign hosting, dedicated instance, retention policies, anonymisation, encryption, access control, logs, client deployment or private cloud: the framework must be defined according to context, data sensitivity and organisational constraints.
QONITIF can be presented through several scenarios: secure SaaS interface, dedicated instance, sovereign cloud, client environment or hybrid architecture depending on field constraints.
Documents, transcripts, analysis elements, deliverables and usage logs must be governed by clear policies: access, retention period, deletion, export and audit.
QONITIF does not conclude for the human. It structures hypotheses, flags attention zones and proposes recommendations that must remain discussable and verifiable.
The same product should not impose the same framework on every environment. A fraud team, inquiry unit, public body or sensitive organisation will not have the same security, access, retention or integration requirements. QONITIF must therefore be framed before any pilot.
QONITIF may process several types of information: case documents, statements, live transcript, interview metadata, attention zones, recommendations, debrief and exports. Retention rules should never be implicit: they must be defined with the user organisation.
QONITIF does not produce a sincerity, guilt or fraud verdict. It helps test the strength of an account through preparation, follow-up and debriefing.
A flagged area must be discussable: why is this point sensitive, what hypothesis is open, what verification is proposed?
The intensity of assistance must be adjusted to case sensitivity, the status of the person heard and the legal or professional framework.
The professional remains responsible for questions asked, decisions made, checks carried out and the final qualification of the case.
Before any experiment, teams must clarify the precise scope: data processed, role of audio, hosting model, integration with existing tools, retention, exports, authorised profiles, auditability, methodological limits and user acceptability conditions.
In sensitive contexts, efficiency is not enough. Data framework, system limits and the role of human judgement must be made explicit from the start.